601. Underneath the Denmark-Russia BIT, as there's no restricting language, it is quite distinct that its arbitration clause in Report 8 gives jurisdiction regarding the defense granted in Post 4 of that BIT for expropriation. Hence, by means of the MFN clause in Post 3 IPPA, the current Tribunal does have jurisdiction in that regard at the same ti

3rd, the damages Claimant seeks are based upon an Evaluation at odds With all the statements in Claimant’s Reply that Yukos' tax assessments weren't them selves expropriatory actions. Given that the supplemental expert report of Professor James Dow displays, LECG’s calculation of damages, on which Claimant depends, is based on the exact same "r